• From: Walter Underwood <wunder@i...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 09:24:59 -0800

At 07:13 PM 2/21/99 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>
>If anyone thinks layering specs and layering processing is a good or bad
>idea, please let me know.

Be sure to read RFC 817, "Modularity and Efficiency in Protocol
Implementation". The short, short version of that paper is
that layering in specs helps clarity and that layering in 
implementation hurts speed.

There are many copies around, here is a pretty one:

   http://www.andrew2.andrew.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc817.html

wunder

--
Walter R. Underwood
wunder@i...
wunder@b... (home)
http://software.infoseek.com/cce/ (my product)
http://www.best.com/~wunder/
1-408-543-6946

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published
    • From: Rob Schoening <rschoening@u...>
  • RE: Announcement: XML Infoset Requirements Published
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • layering specs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Confusion about conditional sections
• Next by Date: RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))
• Previous by thread: layering specs
• Next by thread: A question for developers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread