• From: Michael.Kay@i...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:29:26 -0000

> > My first cut at it says that all VCs except the following can be
> > checked given the full left context (in stream terms, all that
> > has come before):

Which reminds me that SAX still needs some kind of statement about when
errors are detected and reported. If we ask a ModSAX parser to do
validation, do we get a guarantee that a duplicate ID attribute will be
reported when the first duplicate value is encountered, or is the parser
allowed to wait until end of document?

Mike Kay

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: layering specs
• Next by Date: Well-formed vs. valid
• Previous by thread: Re: layering specs
• Next by thread: RE: Validation Conditions (was Streaming XML (was ...))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread