[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: roddey@u...
  • To: xml-dev@i...
  • Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:24:00 -0700




>I'd say you MUST do this.
>
>Consider this sort of structure, which I found in a version of
>the XML Docbook DTD:
>
>    <![ %TOGGLE1; [
>         <!ENTITY % something "contents">
>    ]]>
>    <![ %TOGGLE2; [
>         <!ELEMENT %something; ANY>
>    ]]>
>
>That is, if you tried to parse the contents of the second conditional
>section and something like the first one hadn't been parsed, you would
>be in undeserved trouble.

That makes sense, yes. I guess that's argument enough that it's the only
way to do it.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member