• From: Michael.Kay@i...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:22:35 -0000

> > It so happens I did some recent measurements as follows:
> > 
> > SAX parsers:
> > xp         4387 ms
> > oracle     7862 ms
> > xml4j      7771 ms
> > sun        3736 ms
> > 
> > DOM implementations:
> > sun        9634 ms
> > xml4j     11677 ms
> > oracle     9784 ms
> > docuverse 10685 ms (using xp parser)
> 
> Thanks.
> And what is your bench configuration? 
> Parser versions, computer, OS, memory, JVM, ...? -  Didier Bolf.
> 
You're asking me to do the job properly! I only had half an hour... 

Computer: Fujitsu Technicl, Intel Pentium II processor (how do I find out
which?)
OS: Windows NT 4.0 Workstation
Memory 64Mb
JVM: Sun Java 2 (JDK 1.2)

This is a bit irrelevant as the main variable is the data file: any
properly-done benchmark would use a public domain data file (or preferably a
selection), whereas mine unfortunately was confidential.

Mike Kay

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: Next Round
• Next by Date: RE: XML pages from Databases
• Previous by thread: RE: Ptr to Fast Well-Formed XML parser (Java)?
• Next by thread: Xpointer Entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread