• From: Michael.Kay@i...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:09:05 -0000

> "Namespaces in XML" seems to be going down this path as no 
> one will admit that it is a massive failure.

I agree with you that "Namespaces" is technically inelegant, it also has the
problem of being incompatible with a lot of other XML things. Unfortunately,
though, I think it is doomed to succeed.

Mike Kay 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Why SAX needs namespace support
    • From: <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why informal specs usually win
• Next by Date: RE: Ptr to Fast Well-Formed XML parser (Java)?
• Previous by thread: RE: Next Round
• Next by thread: Why SAX needs namespace support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread