• From: didier@c... (Didier BOLF)
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 12:05:25 GMT

> > Last year in May, Mike Kay made a parser benchmark with a 
> > simple SAX 1.0 application. The bench was between AElfred, Lark, MSXML, 
> > xml4j and XP and at the time XP was the fastest. Perhaps he could do the 
> > benchmark again?
> 
> It so happens I did some recent measurements (different data file) as
> follows:
> 
> SAX parsers:
> xp         4387 ms
> oracle     7862 ms
> xml4j      7771 ms
> sun        3736 ms
> 
> DOM implementations:
> sun        9634 ms
> xml4j     11677 ms
> oracle     9784 ms
> docuverse 10685 ms (using xp parser)

Thanks.
And what is your bench configuration? 
Parser versions, computer, OS, memory, JVM, ...?

Best regards.

Didier Bolf.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: OSS vs W3C? was: Next Round
• Next by Date: Re: Next Round
• Previous by thread: Re: Ptr to Fast Well-Formed XML parser (Java)? (C-expat)
• Next by thread: RE: Ptr to Fast Well-Formed XML parser (Java)?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread