• From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@p...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 13:59:56 -0400

At 01:45 PM 8/11/98 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>The problem is that we don't have a good name for a collection of XML
>documents working tightly together, the way that a collection of Java
>classes can work in an applet or application -- "web" seems too loose,
>and "docuverse" seems too New-Age.  Any suggestions?

"Forest"?

John E. Simpson          | It's no disgrace t'be poor, 
simpson@p...      | but it might as well be.
                         |            -- "Kin" Hubbard


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Java class != XML entity
• Next by Date: John Cowan's view on SAX extensions for ns drafts
• Previous by thread: Re: Availability of WG and SIG archives (was Re: Namespaces and XML validation)
• Next by thread: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread