• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>, "xml-dev@i..." <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 10:29:49 -0700

At 06:42 PM 8/11/98 +0200, james anderson wrote:

>i'm directing attention to the fact, that the present draft suggests encodings
>and mechanisms which are not sufficient to accomplish this, its own correct
>and achievable goal.

Although I read this mailing list pretty regularly, I missed the posting in
which you demonstrated that this was the case.  I suspect others may have,
as well.  Could you post a pointer into the hypermail archive to the
message where you argued this? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Availability of WG and SIG archives (was Re: Namespaces and XML validation)
    • From: james anderson <James.Anderson@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespaces and XML validation
• Next by Date: RE: Schemas and Other Crucial XML Questions
• Previous by thread: Error in WD-DOM-19980720: Notation has no nodeType value
• Next by thread: Re: Availability of WG and SIG archives (was Re: Namespaces and XML validation)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread