• From: "Don Park" <donpark@q...>
• To: "XML Dev" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 07:01:27 -0700

>> The problem is that we don't have a good name for a collection of XML
>> documents working tightly together, the way that a collection of Java
>> classes can work in an applet or application -- "web" seems too loose,
>> and "docuverse" seems too New-Age.  Any suggestions?


There is a spec named "XML-Package" which addressed the problem of packaging
multiple XML documents and related resources into a single XML document.
While the spec itself is on-hold at the moment, "package" or "pack" sounds
like a good name.

BTW, Docuverse is my company name so don't wear it out <g>.

Don Park
CTO/Docuverse



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Next by Date: Re: John Cowan's view on SAX extensions for ns drafts
• Previous by thread: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Next by thread: Java class != XML entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread