• From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@i...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 08:17:14 -0500

At 01:45 PM 8/11/98 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>
>The problem is that we don't have a good name for a collection of XML
>documents working tightly together, the way that a collection of Java
>classes can work in an applet or application -- "web" seems too loose,
>and "docuverse" seems too New-Age.  Any suggestions?

Bounded object set?

Cheers,

E.
--
<Address HyTime=bibloc>
W. Eliot Kimber, Senior Consulting SGML Engineer
ISOGEN International Corp.
2200 N. Lamar St., Suite 230, Dallas, TX 75202.  214.953.0004
www.isogen.com
</Address>

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: "David G. Durand" <dgd@c...>
  • RE: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: Dean Roddey <roddey@u...>
  • Re: Namespaces and XML validation
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>
  • Java class != XML entity
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace Processing Hints and Rant on Scoping/Defaulting
• Next by Date: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Previous by thread: Re: More on Namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Java class != XML entity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread