For record.

Even if I know the answer.

Even if the answer is obvious.

I would still ask.

I would still check.

As a lawyer, even if I know the relevant clauses of a law, I will still
verify that I refer to the exact clause, and also briefly review that
clause again.

Schimon

On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 11:14:36 -0000
"Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx"
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Perhaps your questions would be answered best on
> a browser forum?
> 
> regards
> 
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 11:12, Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx <
> xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 10:14:22 -0000
> > "David Carlisle d.p.carlisle@xxxxxxxxx"
> > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 10:03, Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx <
> > > xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 09:24:23 -0000
> > > > "David Carlisle d.p.carlisle@xxxxxxxxx"
> > > > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 09:14, Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >  
> > > > > > Technically, it is not a critical concern; yet
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It certainly be helpful to solve, since the attempts to try
> > > > > > to censor XML in favour of a gimped version of XML (HTML5),
> > > > > > it appears that internet browsers do not render this XHTML
> > > > > > node properly, as it is treated as XML which "browsers"
> > > > > > (i.e. spyware) ignore.  
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > All modern browsers will render namespaced prefixed  xml if
> > > > > served as xml This works
> > > > > in firefox, chrome and edge at least with the bold being bold
> > > > > and the link being a link.
> > > > >
> > > > > <xhtml:html xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
> > > > >
> > > > >  <xhtml:body>
> > > > >  <xhtml:p>this <xhtml:b>that</xhtml:b> and the other</xhtml:p>
> > > > >  <xhtml:p>this <xhtml:a href="https://google.com">google
> > > > > link</xhtml:a></xhtml:p>
> > > > >  </xhtml:body>
> > > > > </xhtml:html>
> > > > >  
> > > >
> > > > You are correct.
> > > >
> > > > Hoever, element "xhtml:p" is not realized as a paragraph, as all
> > > > text is rendered as a single line; and, therefore, my statement
> > > > again "modern" spyware (browser  
> > >
> > >
> > > That sounds like user error, serving with an incorrect mime type,
> > > not an issue with the browser.
> > >
> > > from
> > >
> > > <xhtml:html xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
> > >  <xhtml:head>
> > >   <xhtml:style>p {border: solid thin black; background-color:
> > > yellow;}</xhtml:style>
> > >  </xhtml:head>
> > >  <xhtml:body>
> > >   <xhtml:h1>Testing</xhtml:h1>
> > >   <xhtml:p>this <xhtml:b>that</xhtml:b> and the other</xhtml:p>
> > >   <xhtml:p>this <xhtml:a href="https://google.com">google
> > > link</xhtml:a></xhtml:p>
> > >  </xhtml:body>
> > > </xhtml:html>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > i get a rendering of
> > >
> > > [image: image.png]
> > >
> > >
> > > In all the common browsers
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > > ).  
> > > >
> > > > https://todo.sr.ht/~bptato/chawan/119
> > > > So it is with Chawan.
> > > >
> > > > Schimon
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  
> >
> > David.
> >
> > Which MIME-Type should servers send so that this document would be
> > realized properly?
> >
> > Schimon