*   XSLT version 3.1? Do you need that odd version number to run your code?
Eek!

Good catch Martin. Thank you!

/Roger

From: Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2023 9:15 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXT] Re:  Herebs how to query an XML Schema that consists of
many files

On 19/10/2023 15:b
07, Roger L Costello costello@b
mitre.b
org wrote:
<xsl:b
stylesheet
xmlns:b
xsl="http:b
//www.b
w3.b
org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:b
xs="http:b
//www.b
w3.b
org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:b
scm="http:b
//ns.b
saxonica.b
com/schema-component-model"

On 19/10/2023 15:07, Roger L Costello
costello@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:costello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<xsl:stylesheet
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"<http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/T
ransform>
    xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSch
ema>
    xmlns:scm="http://ns.saxonica.com/schema-component-model"<http://ns.saxon
ica.com/schema-component-model>
    exclude-result-prefixes="#all"
    version="3.1">



XSLT version 3.1? I saw someone else wanting an XSLT 3.1 spec recently
mandating XSLT 3.0 plus XPath 3.1 support but I don't think it has happened.

Do you need that odd version number to run your code?




XSL-List info and archive<http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
EasyUnsubscribe<http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/673357> (by
email<>)