Right ! But the point here was EMacs is able to work on very large
files, and is a little bit easier than vi (according to some EMacs
fans...) that as also some XML extensions...
Christophe
Le 17/08/2022 C 12:05, Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx a C)critB :
> On 17 August 2022 09:51:25 "Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx"
> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> [b&] For this kind of documents, prefer some simple text editors, like
>> EMacs or others that are able to work woth large files.
>>
>
> Not forgetting that Emacs has modes (packages) which make it a
> fully-fledged XML editor. All open source.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/2837134>
> (by email <>)
|