Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
hello.
- about the element() scheme being required: http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/#xml-included-items section 4.2: [...] third-last paragraph: "XPointers of the forms described in [XPointer Framework] and [XPointer element() scheme] must be supported." - about the problem testing ft-include2.xsl (by which i think you mean ft-include2.x*m*l): this works for me, resulting in ultimately including include1.xml. i am using saxonsa-8.8j. what are you using? i found that all xslt 2.0 implementations other than saxon which i have tried so far are highly unsatisfactory in terms of implementation quality (and i am not affiliated with saxonica in any way). if possible, please cc be on mails to the list, because i am not subscribed to receive all posts individually. thanks for your feedback and kind regards, erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret@xxxxxxxxxxxx - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (iSchool)
|
