Hi Menon,
   As I said earlier, I don't think this is feasible. We cannot have a
SAX like driver for each custom application. Its like Cars have Tiers.
But can Tiers have Cars?

Regards,
Mukul

On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mukul,
>
> I have only thought of this from the usage perspective. Implementation
> is far outside the horizon as of now.
> Since I am not a Guru in the parsing domain, I really cant make
> statements or observations on it's feasibility issues.Why dont you let
> me know the issues that you anticipate ?
>
> rgds,
> Menon
>
> On 8/10/05, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Menon,
> >    Can you tell what implementation ideas you have in mind? It seems
> > to me you want to write a SAX like driver for each custom application.
> > I am doubtful if this can be feasible.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mukul
> >
> > On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Mukul,
> > >
> > > Sorry if I hadnt been clear enough, but I wasnt proposing this to
> > > abide by SAX architecture .
> > > This is just another way of doing things that SAX does in its own way.
> > >
> > > cheers!
> > > Menon
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
>
> -Ramkumar Menon
>  A typical Macroprocessor