Hi Mukul,

Sorry if I hadnt been clear enough, but I wasnt proposing this to
abide by SAX architecture .
This is just another way of doing things that SAX does in its own way.

cheers!
Menon


On 8/10/05, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 8/10/05, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > As an alternative, what if the User defines explicit methods like
> >
> > public void startEmployee() [simplified here- ignoting namespace
mappings]
> > public void endEmployee()
> > public void onEmptyAdddress()
> > public void onAttr_Employee_Name() [this is just illustrative of the
> > attributes scenario.]
>
> Hi Menon,
>   SAX does'nt have this architecture.
>
> Regards,
> Mukul
>
> > rgds,
> > Menon
> >
> > --
> > Shift to the left, shift to the right!
> > Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!
> >
> > -Ramkumar Menon
> >  A typical Macroprocessor
>
>


--
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
 A typical Macroprocessor