Thanks Mike and David..

Regards,
Mukul

--- Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Bob's article has miscopied the relevant text from
> the spec. If you follow
> the link to the text it is quoting, you will read:
> 
> [Definition: A sequence is an ordered collection of
> zero or more items.] 
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx]
> 
> > Sent: 04 July 2005 09:55
> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject:  Unordered sequences in XPath 2.0
> > 
> > I am reading this article -
> > http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2005/02/02/xpath2.html
> > 
> > It says..
> > "A sequence is an unordered collection of zero or
> more
> > items."
> > (Please note the word unordered).
> > 
> > Then it says, "An XPath expression describes a set
> of
> > nodes, the value of that XPath expression is a
> > sequence". 
> > 
> > This means, that the sequence representation of
> XPath
> > 2.0 expression will be unordered.. Is this true? I
> > think, this was not the case with XPath 1.0? 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Mukul
> > 
> > 
> > 		
> >
> ____________________________________________________
> 
> > Yahoo! Sports 
> > Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy
> Football 
> > http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com