Subject: RE: Unordered sequences in XPath 2.0
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:13:57 +0100
|
Bob's article has miscopied the relevant text from the spec. If you follow
the link to the text it is quoting, you will read:
[Definition: A sequence is an ordered collection of zero or more items.]
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:mukul_gandhi@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 July 2005 09:55
> To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Unordered sequences in XPath 2.0
>
> I am reading this article -
> http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2005/02/02/xpath2.html
>
> It says..
> "A sequence is an unordered collection of zero or more
> items."
> (Please note the word unordered).
>
> Then it says, "An XPath expression describes a set of
> nodes, the value of that XPath expression is a
> sequence".
>
> This means, that the sequence representation of XPath
> 2.0 expression will be unordered.. Is this true? I
> think, this was not the case with XPath 1.0?
>
> Regards,
> Mukul
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Sports
> Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
> http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
|