>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    >> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for
    >> safety?
    >> > 
    >> > Neither is completely safe of course,
    >> 

    Michael> The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16,
    Michael> anything else is optional.

    Michael> I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this
    Michael> encoding. The differences are immaterial (different names
    Michael> for some of the characters, I believe) but I prefer
    Michael> international standards as a matter of principle.

Shouldn't this be ISO-646-US?
-- 
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire