Subject: RE: Recognized Unicode characters?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:43:20 +0100
|
> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for safety?
> >
> > Neither is completely safe of course,
>
The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16, anything else is
optional.
I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this encoding. The differences are
immaterial (different names for some of the characters, I believe) but I
prefer international standards as a matter of principle.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
|