Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:50:11 +1000

> A much better name in this particular case would be "define-schema"

Even better:

    define-type


Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.

Current Thread

XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	RE: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Michael Kay
Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Eric van der Vlist	Date	Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Na, James Fuller
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >