RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: RE: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:47:42 +0100

> Anyway it would be interesting to see some more detailed study about 
> integration of subsetted RNG into XSLT 2.0.

It would indeed. Nice to know there's no danger of running out of things to
do.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread

Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek	Thread	Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek	Date	RE: RE: REx6: GMT to BST conv, cknell
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >