Subject: RE: possible? for-each-group inside a for-each-group
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:10:12 -0000
|
> I am trying a for-each-group inside another one, is this
> possible, or do I have to do this in two following transformations??
Yes. it's absolutely possible. You can nest for-each-group statically, or
dynamically, or both. I often nest it recursively.
>
> I tried following stylesheet. Thought about adding a
> current-group() inside the group-ending-with statement,
> didn't work either.
>
> <tatbestand>
> <xsl:for-each-group
> select="par[@class='Entsch_normal'][not(inline[@class='*Gesetz
> esstelle'])]"
> group-starting-with="par[@class='Entsch_normal'][inline[@class
> ='*fett']]">
Since every item in the population is a par element with
@class='Entsch_normal', including this in your starting-with condition is
rather redundant.
>
> <xsl:for-each-group select="*"
> group-ending-with="par[@class='Entsch_normal'][inline[@class='
> *fett']]">
Normally the inner grouping will select all the items in the outer group.
select="*" selects the children of the context item, which is the first item
in the current group. The most common usage is to use
select="current-group()" in the inner grouping. Perhaps you want
select="current-group()/* - but I'm not sure, I don't understand your
requirements well enough.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
|