Subject: Re: redundancy in string(number(current())) = 'NaN' ??
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:00:38 -0400 (EDT)
|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, G. Ken Holman wrote:
> At 2003-06-11 16:38 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > //sales[string(number(current()))='NaN']
> >
> >just to make sure, i'm assuming the "current()" part is
> >redundant, since number() will use the string-value of the
> >context node if there is no argument. do i understand
> >that correctly?
>
> No, I'm afraid you don't. The current() function returns the node that was
> the current node at the beginning of the XPath evaluation ... which could
> be anywhere given this example XPath expression is starting at the root.
ah, got it. i suspected there was something happening there i was
missing.
rday
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|