Subject: redundancy in string(number(current())) = 'NaN' ??
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
|
just poring over Kay's book, filling in the gaps, and in the
section for xsl:message, there's an example that's selecting:
//sales[string(number(current()))='NaN']
just to make sure, i'm assuming the "current()" part is
redundant, since number() will use the string-value of the
context node if there is no argument. do i understand
that correctly?
if so, i assume that that was just put in for aesthetics.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day
Eno River Technologies
Unix, Linux and Open Source training
Waterloo, Ontario
www.enoriver.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|