>   Wrong to say it's "the identity" and to make such an harsh
> statement on a bug. All large software have bugs, sure xsltproc 
> exhibited a bug there. 

As I explained in previous messages my comment did not address xsltproc
specifically, but expressed general disbelief that *any* xslt processor
would behave in this way. So it was another way of saying "C'mon, this
can't be true".

> You're also wrong on the point that libxslt/xsltproc had little 
> testing. 

Everybody can and will make their own conclusion about the real level
of testing of an XSLT processor that does not implement correctly
something so basic as the child::node() node test. 




=====
Cheers,

Dimitre Novatchev.
http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list