Subject: RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation)
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:38:57 -0000
|
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:47:23PM +0100, Tobias Reif wrote:
> > Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > The dependancy on W3C XML Schemas makes it very very unlikely for
> > > me.
> > I agree that dependency on WXS is a bad aspect, but I think
> it won't
> > be
> > required for all implementations.
>
> First news to me, how can you back-up that statement ?
>
See http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#conformance
Specifically:
The XSL Working Group intends to define a conformance level for XSLT
processors that do not perform any schema processing. The detailed rules
for such a processor have yet to be defined.
Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxx
work: Michael.Kay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
