Re: [xsl] N : M transformation

Cart

XML Editor - Download a Free Trial >

See What's New >

Buy Now >

[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

Subject: Re: N : M transformation
From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 00:26:22 +0100

Daniel Veillard wrote:

  heh, don't get depressed !
First until XSLT-2.0 is complete one should not "discard" it, maybe
providing more feedback is needed.

That's the spirit :)

In the meantime EXSLT is one way to label those "common" extensions. I understand that Michael want to focuse on XSLT-2 development. Maybe someone can simply write the patch needed to get Saxon to implement exslt:document, based on the existing Saxon extension (which I implemented too) this should not be too hard. Having EXSLT widely deployed will give the XSL group the time to finish XSLT-2 and XPath-2.

All the regexen realted features are another very important and useful area of XSLT/XPath 2.0.

Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/

XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread

Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: N : M transformation, Daniel Veillard	Thread	xslt2 comments (was: N : M tr, David Carlisle
Re: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif	Date	RE: is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Michael Kay
	Month

XML Editor - Download a 15 Day Free Trial Now >

See What's New in Stylus Studio >

Buy Stylus Studio - XML Editor - Now >