Subject: Re: transformation does happen after copy-of?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:36:39 +0100
|
> DC wrote:
Mike wrote
> node() on its own is short for child::node(),
which is basically what I went on to say. Which seems to suggest that my
message was not internally consistent... oops...
David
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:01:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:37:27 -0400 (EDT) <=
- Jeni Tennison - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:22:54 -0400 (EDT)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 08:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
Andrew Welch - Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:01:39 -0400 (EDT)
|
|
Cart
