[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From Joerg's example: No, it only tests whether there is not a preceding-sibling field element, which has the same @id like the current one. You can write "not(preceding-sibling::field[@id = current()/@id])" if you want. Regards, Joerg XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



