Subject: RE: Using Transforms and #include file
From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:38:37 -0600
|
> 1. My site has a lot of functionality all in one page because of the
> ".innerHTML" technique I'm using. I only need specific scripts for
specific
> content so I didn't want to mass load all script.
Fair enough. However, breaking the individual scripts into individual files
will still work and won't cost you anything.
> 2. When I use the ".innerHTML" method I notice that eventhough you can see
> the representation with the browser, if you try to "viewsource" nothing
> shows up. I'm thinking that If I output my script in the same manner I
don't
> have to bare my "script soul" to the world.
Well I would guess that should be true either way? However, given the
rather random behavior of IE at such times I have no real idea if that would
be true.
I suspect you could read in the entire JS file as a well formed XML fragment
using document() by wrapping it in a CDATA. Start with a simple test and go
from there. That will also tell you whether it is worth going to all the
effort to go all the way...
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: Using Transforms and #include file, (continued)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:28:26 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:07:26 -0500 (EST)
- Hellstern, Manny - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:22:39 -0500 (EST)
- Hunsberger, Peter - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:38:41 -0500 (EST) <=
- Hellstern, Manny - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:56:20 -0500 (EST)
- Hellstern, Manny - Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:57:24 -0500 (EST)
|
|