> Hmm.  Let's see, on the side that insists on language-bound
> xsl:script are
> Michael Kay, Steve Muench and Scott Boag.  All Java XSLT
> implementors, I should add.

And all getting frequent emails from users saying "why can't I write a Java
extension that is portable between Xalan and Saxon and Oracle."

> All, it seems, reluctant to
> pursue standardizing extensions using the existing XSLT 1.0
> facilities.

Not in my case as an individual. Nor do I think the group as a whole has any
reluctance to do this. It just didn't put it top of the list.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list