Subject: Re: XSLT 1.1 comments
From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:19:51 -0500 (EST)
|
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> > I think it would be very nice if someone set up a namespace for experimental
> > extension elements and functions with some simple rules:
> >
> > * Anyone can define a function and register it in this namespace provided
> > that
> > - the name is not already registered
> > - they provide a clear specification of what the function does
> > - the function is intrinsically portable (i.e. it is theoretically capable
> > of being
> > implemented on any processor or any platform)
> > - the function is free of side-effects
> > - there is a four-week period for comments and discussion before the spec
> > is frozen
> > - the person registering the function provides open source
> > implementation(s) that work with at least one processor
> > - there is an opportunity for other people to provide implementation(s)
> > for other processors.
>
> Now you're talking.
>
> Is it not worth trying out this approach for a while before
> diving in with the XSLT 1.1 stuff?
Nice. Very Nice.
;) Clark
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
- Re: XSLT 1.1 comments, (continued)
- Uche Ogbuji - Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:28:34 -0500 (EST)
- David Carlisle - Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:44:47 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:12:16 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:23:23 -0500 (EST)
- Clark C. Evans - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:17:02 -0500 (EST) <=
- Michael Kay - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:54:09 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 10:20:50 -0500 (EST)
- Michael Kay - Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:02:47 -0500 (EST)
- Uche Ogbuji - Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:57:55 -0500 (EST)
|
|