> My point is that in the first place the statement that XSL is not
> Turing-complete is debatable

It's not debatable, it's a lie, thanks for drawing it to our attention.

But presumably xmlhack isn't a peer-reviewed journal, so anyone with a
product to peddle can say what they like.

Mike Kay


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list