[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 01:13 1/02/2001, Linda van den Brink wrote:
My point is that in the first place the statement that XSL is not Turing-complete is debatable, in the second place I'm not convinced that XSL is severely restricted in the possible transformations, and in the third place I wonder whether there is a causal relationship between lack of turing-completeness of XSL and restrictions in possible transformations.
You are also limited in how much you can (easily) manipulate the content of XML as part of the transformation. This is a pretty big constraint. J
http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|

Cart



