Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
From: Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen <TRA@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 15:03:33 +0200
|
> OmniMark advantages :
> - Less resource hogging
I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.
Additionally Omnimark has serious trouble with underscores in element-names. Apparenly XML-input data has to conform to a DTD, which does not always apply for our data.
> - For any other format -> XML, Omnimark is mandatory
Not entirely so. XML is very easy to generate with Perl, and it is equally easy to parse a lot of non-complex text formats in Perl (if you can put it in a regular expression). Parsing XML with Perl is rather slow, though.
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...and...Tubular Bells!"
http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|