Subject: RE: XSLT and Text Processing Languages
From: James Robertson <jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 09:29:54 +1000
|
At 23:03 7/09/2000, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> OmniMark advantages :
> - Less resource hogging
I beg to differ. Given an 150 Mb XML input file, my memory usage with
Omnimark 5.1 grew to 400 Mb, and I was working with a strictly local program.
I think Omnimark will take as much memory is
available, but no more.
How much memory would be required when using
XSLT to parse 150Mb? (Several gig?)
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
