Subject: Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)
From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 22:08:06 -0400
|
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> MSXML3 sure is much faster than that!!!
Have you benchmarked MSXML3 versus the C version of Xalan? My times are for
a complete round trip though an HTTP server including the page transform.
XSL is just part of the equation, there's a SQL server involved too. I'm
also still undecided about the impact of having three processes (Apache, app
server (JServ/XT/XP), dbengine) vs a single process scheme.
Has anyone done any pure benchmarks of just a cached XSLT transform on
MSXML3 vs Xalan?
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
paulo . gaspar - Thu, 1 Jun 2000 14:30:45 -0700
- Jon Smirl - Thu, 1 Jun 2000 22:08:06 -0400 <=
|
|
Cart
