Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)
From: "Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:20:47 +0200
|
Let's say it is getting much better... in beta.
Check:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/xml/general/msxmlprev.asp
Have fun,
Paulo
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 10:04 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?)
Jon Smirl writes:
> solution. Now that MS is up to speed on the XSL bandwagon I'm looking at
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> moving all of my transforms into the browser.
really? did I miss an announcment? do they have an XSL processor that
implements the missing bits of the spec?
Sebastian
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|