Hi David,

David said:
saxon is more complete, xt is usually faster, msxsl has better
integration into a browser. It just depends whether you want
a BMW or a Rover.

Didier replies:
I guess that you meant that XT is faster than the other java based
implementations. Now you raised the point in my mind that it would be
interesting to benchmark Transformiix and msxml to see how fast they are
compared to the fastest java based implementation.

cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list