Hi Sebastian,

Sebastian said:
It's a matter of fact that xt is (currently) faster than saxon or any
of the others[1].

Didier replies:
You probably meant by the [1] (usually a footnote reference) that it is
faster than any of the other Java based XSLT implementations not necessarily
faster than the C++ based implementations.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Conferences: XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list