Subject: Re: FO : precedence
From: pandeng@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Steve Schafer)
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:04:09 GMT
|
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999 07:59:12 -0700, you wrote:
>Before and after should have precedence over start and end, if precedence
>is either true on both adjacent areas or if false on both.
The wording in the current WD implies the opposite. In fact, it
implies that the Precedence properties of fo:region-start or
fo:region-end don't play a role at all.
>The explanation will be clarified.
Anytime soon? :)
-Steve
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|