At 5 Aug 1999 16:51 -0700, Shalperin wrote:
 > There are at least two Java implementations that are kept
 > up-to-date and plenty more written in a handful of other languages.
 > Aside from the msxml.dll, there are several C++ XML parsers written
 > by industry leaders, but, sadly these do not implement XSL(T) - yet
 > they have Java counterparts that do and no immediate plans to
 > implement XSL(T) in the C++ versions.  It begs the question: why is
 > the C++ community being ignored when it comes to XSL(T)?

Saxon and XT are by individuals, not corporations, and one of those
authors has (as far as I know) no official link to XSL.  The same is
probably true for the implementations written in that handful of other
languages.  Perhaps the question is: why is the C++ community ignoring
XSL(T)?

Regards,


Tony Graham
======================================================================
Tony Graham                            mailto:tgraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                    Direct Phone: 301/315-9632
Suite 207                                          Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list