Shalperin writes:
 > > oh dang you just shot yourself in the foot. go straight to jail, do

I *was* joking, you know...

 > Okaaaaaay... that being said (and I don't disagree with you), what
 > *C++* parser implementation do you recommend?  Keep in mind, it
 > must support XSL(T).

you have me at a disadvantage here, because I cannot see why you care
what language something is written in. I can see why you might dislike 
Java, but if I offered you one written in Fortran, is that OK?

unless I mistake, there are no C++ implementations of an XSL engine
conforming to the current draft.

Sebastian


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list