Subject: Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6)
From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 12:44:15 +0700
|
David Schach wrote:
>
> Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor.
>
> > How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)?
> >
> Yes when it is used in a select or test. foo/id(@ref) is interpreted as
> id(foo/@ref). I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used
> in a match.
It would match an element that's referred to by a foo element's ref
attribute.
James
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
