Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor.  

> How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)?
> 
Yes when it is used in a select or test.  foo/id(@ref)  is interpreted as
id(foo/@ref).  I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used
in a match.

David





 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list