>Isn't SGML/DSSSL for the serious print applications?  I thought
>XML/XSL was supposed to be "SGML Lite".  SGML/DSSSL can be used for
>the "serious" people and XML/XSL will be for the masses.

Yes except that XSL has a stated design goal of having at least the
formatting capabilities of DSSSL.

James


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list