---James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >Basicaly, the popular choice was to use the transformational part
of XSL
> >(dare I call it XQL? :-) to convert XML into CSS+XML/HTML.
> 
> What are we supposed to do about serious print applications? What
are we
> supposed to do about footnotes, page references, dictionary-style
headers,
> synchronised marginalia or bi-directional text?
> 

Isn't SGML/DSSSL for the serious print applications?  I thought
XML/XSL was supposed to be "SGML Lite".  SGML/DSSSL can be used for
the "serious" people and XML/XSL will be for the masses.

Toivo Lainevool
tlainevool@xxxxxxx


_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list