Tony Stewart wrote:
>  I'll admit that if
> we must choose just one escape then JavaScript is a pretty good choice
> (perhaps the best), but it's not a panacea and there's no reason to
> handcuff ourselves to just one. Especially considering how quickly
> things change. Do we really want to rewrite the standard next year when
> something better than JavaScript comes along?

Are there any free implementations of JavaScript (with source)?

(Programming language junkies might check out
http://www.zeta.org.au/~atrn/ici/Default.html, as a possible
alternative)

 - Darrin


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list