Subject: RE: Style vs. transformation
From: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 10:43:39 -0500
|
I second the requirement for multiple passes. I could foresee another
use besides just breaking a problem down into smaller pieces. It could
also be useful if someone already has an existing XSL script for a class
of documents (A). The user has a second class of documents (B) that are
almost the same as A. Wouldn't it be nice if the user could just
augment the script for A by putting a transformation pass at the front
that transforms B to A? Sure they could invoke the XSL processor twice,
but this is a big performance hit on some systems. Wouldn't it be nice
if one could do it with a single invokation of the XSL processor?
Rob
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Sean Mc Grath [SMTP:digitome@xxxxxx]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 6:39 AM
>To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: Style vs. transformation
>
> [snip]
>
>I would like to see something in XSL that supported
>"chaining" the flow object tree resulting from one
>stylesheet transformation into another stylesheet.
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
|
Cart
